They exact
reasons sits relaunch often stem from their individual histories, but there are
three general motivators : enhancing technical features, creating a new or
different brand image, and giving the site a fresh look. Often two or even all
three of these factors are involved in decision to relaunch upgrade.
Technical Upgrades. At one level, of course, all changes to
a Web site have technical ramifications but relaunches based on technical
features ramifications but relaunches based on technical features are concerned
with offering new functions, new applications easier navigation, and and so on.
These upgrades have tended to take different deforms as the Web has evolved.
Many of the earliest relaunches by large corporations were migrating from the
so-called brochure ware of text-and image descriptive sites to more interactive
models, many featuring personalization options that allowed users to create
accounts and store personal preferences and information on the site. A further
extension of this was much celebrated (and sometimes later lamented) push
toward e-commerce, enabling online transaction of all sorts. Behind the scenes, such revisions were
sometimes related to the adoption of customer relationship management (CRM) systems and advanced application servers from
vendors like BEA, IBM, Oracle, and
sun.
If the
benefits of a technical upgrade are new front-and back end capabilities, the
drawback can be in a bumpy transition. Retooling a large site can be
exceedingly complicated and may lead to unexpected problems, as was the case in
a publicized failure during an ambitious relaunch of eBay.com in 1999. The company didn’t devote adequate staffing
to the project, and the result was costly downtime in which visitors could not
use the sit or all of its function.
Rebranding- Creating a new brand image-or significantly
revising and existing one-is a weighty marketing decision , usually separate
from any technical considerations.
Companies face rebranding, for example when the merge or party to an
acquisition, when their marketing results are substantially below potential, or
when they adopt a new marketing or commerce strategy. The risk is of course
that new brand image will alienate the market and cause the company to lose
some of the equity it had established in its brand. When confronted with change, customers often
adopt an agnostic, even wary stance, requiring
the company to demonstrate to them again that its brand is worth their
loyalty and high regard. For instance,
long flash animations on the home page a trend of the late 1990s as the flash
language and higher-speed connections came into vogue-are widely considered annoyances that may drive some visitors away.
In
situations like mergers and acquisitions, however, the company has little
choice but to relaunch in order to reflect the new identity of combined firm.
Here the relaunch is most likely party
of an integrated marketing program aimed at raising awareness of the new
company and articulating its value new propositions to potential costumers; Web
content may be reinforced by advertising and publicity efforts.
No comments:
Post a Comment